Charlie Watts: the calm, sensible eye of the Rolling Stones’ rock’n’roll storm

By any requirements, Charlie Watts was an unlikely candidate for rock stardom.

He was quiet, drily humorous and unfailingly modest, traits theoretically higher suited to his preliminary occupation as a graphic designer than the scream-rent world of 60s pop. Moreover, by his personal admission, he didn’t significantly take care of rock’n’roll (“I didn’t know something about it … I used to hate Elvis Presley. Miles Davis – that’s what I thought-about somebody,” he advised an interviewer in 1993) and had initially needed to have the rhythm and blues so beloved of his bandmates defined to him: “I didn’t know what it was. I assumed it meant Charlie Parker, performed gradual”.

At first, not less than, the opposite Rolling Stones puzzled if Watts was even able to taking part in the music they wished to play, moderately than his beloved jazz. “Charlie swings very properly, however can’t rock,” wrote a annoyed Keith Richards in a 1963 diary entry. “Fabulous man, although.”

Because it turned out, Richards couldn’t have been extra flawed. Nothing if not a fast scholar, Watts not solely realized to rock, however got here to be hailed as one of many best drummers in rock historical past – typically the best of all – though he actually occupied a singular place inside that individual pantheon.

Charlie Watts: Rolling Stones drummer dies at age 80 – video obituary

01:34

Charlie Watts: Rolling Stones drummer dies at age 80 – video obituary

He was not a flamboyant, risk-taking showman within the method of the Who’s Keith Moon, nor an exponent of pummelling uncooked energy alongside the traces of Led Zeppelin’s John Bonham, nor an skilled in tough time signatures like Rush’s Neal Peart. He actually didn’t go in for the form of elaborate tools – gongs and double bass drums – that rock drummers continuously use to attract consideration to themselves on the rear of the stage, preferring to stay with a 1957 equipment that was tiny by fashionable requirements.

There have been moments when Watts’ drumming may very well be showy – as on his thunderous efficiency on 1966’s Paint It Black – however often, Watts majored in much less apparent abilities: good timing, a swing to his taking part in rooted within the hours he’d spent drumming alongside to jazz information in his bed room within the late 50s, a specific brilliance with shuffle patterns, a capability to supply a rock-solid footing no matter whether or not they had been venturing into psychedelia, disco, reggae or funk.

Sometimes, his bandmates deemed it essential to remind the world how nice he was. “Charlie’s good tonight, innee?” supplied Mick Jagger, after a efficiency of Chuck Berry’s Little Queenie on the 1970 reside album Get Yer Ya-Yas Out!, whereas each Keith Richards and Ronnie Wooden urged the Rolling Stones merely couldn’t proceed with out him, a idea that’s presumably now going to be examined: “Charlie’s the engine,” stated Wooden in 2003. “And we don’t go anyplace with out the engine.”

With the Rolling Stones in 2002.
With the Rolling Stones in 2002. (L to R) Charlie Watts, Mick Jagger, Ronnie Wooden, and Keith Richards. {Photograph}: Stan Honda/AFP/Getty Photographs

You would see why his fellow Stones felt the necessity to laud him. Definitely Watts – given to suggesting he was “not significantly proficient” however “very fortunate” – wasn’t going to attract consideration to himself. However his brilliance as a drummer didn’t really want underlining: it was already obvious to anybody with ears. Take heed to his taking part in on 1968’s Jigsaw Puzzle, which concurrently drives the music alongside and punctuates it with a sequence of apparently easy drum rolls.

Typically, his taking part in appeared virtually counterintuitive, at odds with all the things else that was occurring within the music. On the darkish, waning-of-the-60s masterpiece Gimme Shelter, he supplied a masterclass in restraint whereas Mick Jagger and the backing vocalists wailed about rape and homicide: the attention on the centre of the apocalyptic storm.

And typically, his taking part in appeared to point out an innate understanding of what the music was about. On Get Off Of My Cloud, he performs precisely the identical fill each two bars all through the music’s verses: there’s one thing relentless about it, which inserts completely given Get Off Of My Cloud is about annoyed anger.

1983’s Undercover of the Night time, in the meantime, is laden with then-hip studio results, in one of many latterday Stones’ common bids for contemporaneity, however Watts’s taking part in cuts via all of it. There was one thing very telling about that. For the reason that early 80s, the Rolling Stones’ more and more sporadic new albums have been desperately uneven, their recording continuously riven by character clashes and livid disputes about which musical route the band ought to take. The one factor about them that nobody ever appeared to criticise was Watts’s drumming: he appeared to stay fully unflappable, musically dependable when his bandmates had been something however.

His reticence additionally labored in his favour. Married since 1964, he appeared largely uninterested within the sorts of excesses that his fellow Stones tended to enjoy, whether or not chemical or sexual.

One well-known story from the early 70s concerned the band being invited to occasion on the Playboy Mansion: Watts slipped away and sequestered himself within the video games room for your complete evening. You may gauge the remainder of the band’s sense of shock when he did, briefly, succumb to drug habit within the early 80s from the truth that Keith Richards – of all individuals – felt impelled to intervene and inform Watts to cease it.

Essentially the most legendary story about Watts – the presumably apocryphal one about him dropping his mood when Mick Jagger referred to him as “my drummer”, punching him within the face and telling him he was, in actual fact, Watts’s singer – is famous as a result of it appeared so completely out of character.

Finally, his reticence grew to become one thing of what would now be referred to as a model, his unruffled, fantastically tailor-made calmness and detachment as attribute in its personal method as Richards’ dissolution.

Within the 80s and 90s, because the Rolling Stones’ excursions grew to become ever-more extravagant son-et-lumière shows involving pyrotechnics, big inflatables and cantilevered bridges, the huge screens along with the stage would sometimes give attention to Watts.

Virtually invariably stone-faced as he performed, he appeared to provide off an ineffable air of barely aloof bemusement, as if he thought it was all fully ridiculous and might need been extra content material pursuing his love of jazz, one thing he confined to downtime between grossing a whole lot of tens of millions on the earth’s arenas and stadiums.

It made for an ideal distinction with Mick Jagger’s showboating, even when the reality was that Watts clearly didn’t discover it that ridiculous, on condition that he was at all times closely concerned with the stage and manufacturing design for the Stones’ excursions. Maybe he was a extra sophisticated man than his low-key public picture urged. Both method, it’s onerous to see how the Rolling Stones will ever be the identical with out him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *