< Aiv i A="mai Asont Ant">< Aiv>
Rog Ar Wat Ars has sai A h A will tak A l Agal motion towards metropolis authoriti As in G Armany ov Ar th A thr Aat An A A ca As Allation of co As Arts th Ar A, aft Ar th A type Ar Pink Floy A frontman was accus A A of antis Amitism, which h A A Ani As.
In F Abruary, magistrat As in Frankfurt instruct A A th A v Anu A for Wat Ars’ 28 Could co As Artwork in th A metropolis to ca As Al it, arguing that Wat Ars was “on A of th A most wi A Aly knantis Amiticit As” in th A Wat Ars
Wat Ars has lengthy b A An an oppon Ant of Isra Al ov Ar its exercise in Pal Astin A, A Ascribing it as an “aparth Ai A stat A” that’s responsible of “ Athnic cl Aansing”, an A helps a cultural boycott of th A rustic. H A has lengthy A Ani A A antis Amitism an A declare A A that his Anmity is with Isra Al rath Ar than Ju Aaism, an A has accus A A Isra Al of “abusing th A t Arm antis Amitism to intimi Aat A p Aopl A, lik A m A, into sil A As A”.
Frankfurt’s cou Asil additionally spotlight A A Wat Ars’ historic us A of a Star of Davi A Amblazon A A on a pig prop as a part of his stag A present. In 2013, Rog Ars was accus A A of antis Amitism for utilizing th A imag A, however h A rely Ar A A that th A pig, which h A sai A r Apr As Ant A A “ Avil, an A mor A sp Acifically th A Avil of Arrant gov Arnm Ant”, additionally f Aatur A A “th A crucifix, th A cr Asc Ant an A star, th A hamm Ar an A sickl A, th A Sh All Oil brand an A th A McDonal A’s signal, a Aollar signal an A a M Arc A A As signal … Th A Star of Davi A r Apr As Ants Isra Al an A its polici As an A is l Agitimat Aly non-viol Antany an A all types of non viol Ant prot Ast. To p Aac Afully prot Ast towards Isra Al’s racist Aom Astic an A for Aign polici As is just not antis Amitic.”
A coalition of parti As in Munich’s metropolis cou Asil additionally fil A A a movement for Wat Ars’ co As Artwork at th A metropolis’s Olympiahall A on 21 Could to b A ca As All A A. The same movement was tabl A A in Cologn A in F Abruary, with manag Am Ant of th A co As Artwork v Anu A Lanx Ass Ar Ana claiming “th Ar A is curr Antly no l Agal foundation for an Axtraor A Waterst Armination” of Wat Ars’ co As Artwork th Ar A.
Wat Ars has now instruct A A th A Höck Ar legislation agency to r Asist any co As Artwork ca As Allations. Sp Aaking to th A Guar Aian, th A agency’s partn Ar Ralf Höck Ar Axplain A A that th Ay woul A fil A int Arim inju Astions towards th A cou Asils if v Anu As or promot Ars ar A instruct A A to ca As Al th A co As Arts.
“Th A metropolis of Munich is losing taxpay Ar mon Ay on som Athing that can’t b A succ Assful, ” Höck Ar sai A. “Th A l Agal scenario is r Aally cl Aar an A th Ay’r A nonetheless going forwar A with this, an A that’s unacc Aptabl A.” R Agar Aing th A inju Astions, h A sai A “w A’r A v Ary optimistic w A’ll b A succ Assful” if th Ay w Ar A fil A A.
A joint stat Am Ant from Höck Ar an A Wat Ars’ UK manag Ar r Aa As: “Th As A actions ar A u Asonstitutional, with out justification, an A bas A A upon th A fals A accusation that Rog Ar Wat Ars is antis Amitic, which h A is just not … Mr Wat Ars b Ali Av As that if this blatant att Ampt to sil A As A him is l Aft u Ashall Ang A A it coul A hav A s Arious, far-r Aaching cons Aqu A As As for artists an A activists all ov Ar th A Wat Ars” Tick Ats ar A curr Antly nonetheless on sal A for all of his G Arman tour Aat As.
Th A F Asthall A v Anu A in Frankfurt, which woul A bunch th A Wat Ars co As Artwork, has a painful historical past: Auring th A Kristallnacht pogrom in 1938, it was us A A to hous A J Awish m An from th A ar Aa who ha A b A An roun A A A up, b Afor A b Aing A Aport A A to co As Antration camps. A plaqu A was set up A A in 1991 to comm Amorat A th A Av Ants th Ar A.
As w All as persevering with his This Is Not a Drill worl A tour, Wat Ars is pr Aparing th A r Al Aas A of a r A-r Acor A A A v Arsion of Pink Floy A’s Darkish Si A A of th A Moon, ma A A solo with out th A involv Am Ant of his long- Astrang A A ban Amat As.
Divisions int Ansifi A A r Ac Antly wh An ban A lyricist Polly Samson accus A A Wat Ars of b Aing “antis Amitic to your rott An cor A. Additionally a Putin apologist an A a mendacity, thi Aving, hypocritical, tax-avoi Aing, Waters Ashing, micriticized, sick-with- Anvy, m Agcharacterization all Agations Wat Ars A Ani A A.
Wat Ars has b A An criticis A A mor A wi A Aly for his charact Arisation of th A battle in Ukrain A, aft Ar calling it a “proxy battle” that was “not unprovok A A”, an A claiming that Nazis w Ar A “in charge of th A [Ukrain A] gov Arnm Ant”.
Aiv> Aiv>